Ownercz
/
ssme-thesis
mirror of https://github.com/Ownercz/ssme-thesis.git
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Projects Releases Wiki Activity

Research date range

This commit is contained in:
Radim Lipovčan 2019-03-30 19:09:29 +01:00
parent 20be114db9
commit ee354f52e7
1 changed files with 5 additions and 5 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

10
Thesis.tex
View File

@ -958,7 +958,7 @@ Data collection method was online only and was using the survey website software
To reduce nonresponse rate, participants were asked only to fill out parts that were significant for them, e.g., Monero recovery part stayed hidden in the form if the user selected that he/she had never made any recovery of the seed or wallet keys in the previous part.
The complete survey is attached in the Chapter \ref{monero-user-study-pdf}.
The data from the respondents were collected from 11.15.2018 to 01.27.2019. The complete survey is attached in the Appendix Figure \ref{monero-user-study-pdf}.
\section{Collected data}
Before entering the survey, each participant had to pass the bot test by entering the correct CAPTCHA, which resulted in 179 participants of the questionnaire in total. As for survey data cleansing, following measurements for valid dataset were taken:
@ -1813,10 +1813,10 @@ This part was answered only by those respondents that selected Yes (15 out of 11
The primary cause of problems was mining malware (8) or some form of mining script (7). The main affected platform was running Windows (10), and malware was recognized mainly by slow system response (7) and high CPU usage (11).
When trying to compare the security of individual wallet types, one of the important factors that determine its usability and security is wallet recovery rate. To compare hot and cold wallet approach using the chi-square test, following hypothesis was set:
When trying to compare the security of individual wallet types, one of the important factors that determine its usability and security is wallet recovery rate. To compare the hot and cold wallet approach using the chi-square test, the following hypothesis was set:
\begin{itemize}\itemsep0em
\item H0: There is no difference between hot and cold wallet and their recovery rate.
\item H1: There is a difference between hot and cold wallet and their recovery rate.
\item H0: There is no difference between the hot and cold wallet and their recovery rate.
\item H1: There is a difference between the hot and cold wallet and their recovery rate.
\end{itemize}
The table with extracted values is in the Table \ref{table:user-chi}. The chi-square statistic is 0.489. The p-value is .484356. The result is not significant at p < .05. Therefore it means that the data provide little or no evidence that the null hypothesis is false.
@ -2480,7 +2480,7 @@ Data collection method was online only and was using the survey website software
To reduce nonresponse rate, participants were asked only to fill out parts that were significant for them, e.g., Windows OS part stayed hidden in the form if the user selected that he/she used Linux OS only.
The complete survey is attached in the Appendix Figure \ref{monero-miners-study-pdf}.
The data from the respondents were collected from 11.15.2018 to 01.27.2019. The complete survey is attached in the Appendix Figure \ref{monero-miners-study-pdf}.
%\vspace{-0.7em}
\section{Collected data}
Before entering the survey, each participant had to pass the bot test by entering the correct CAPTCHA, which resulted in 323 participants of the questionnaire in total. As for survey data cleansing, following measurements for valid dataset were taken: