Paper/patches/server/0550-Synchronize-PalettedContainer-instead-of-ThreadingDe.patch

92 lines
4.2 KiB
Diff

From 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Aikar <aikar@aikar.co>
Date: Fri, 29 May 2020 20:29:02 -0400
Subject: [PATCH] Synchronize PalettedContainer instead of
ThreadingDetector/Semaphore
Mojang has flaws in their logic about chunks being concurrently
wrote to. So we constantly see crashes around multiple threads writing.
Additionally, java has optimized synchronization so well that its
in many times faster than trying to manage read write locks for low
contention situations.
And this is extremely a low contention situation.
diff --git a/src/main/java/net/minecraft/world/level/chunk/PalettedContainer.java b/src/main/java/net/minecraft/world/level/chunk/PalettedContainer.java
index 2e5afbd2a69c4eeabd9a48bff6a37a7004565716..2fa0097a9374a89177e4f1068d1bfed30b8ff122 100644
--- a/src/main/java/net/minecraft/world/level/chunk/PalettedContainer.java
+++ b/src/main/java/net/minecraft/world/level/chunk/PalettedContainer.java
@@ -30,14 +30,14 @@ public class PalettedContainer<T> implements PaletteResize<T>, PalettedContainer
public final IdMap<T> registry;
private volatile PalettedContainer.Data<T> data;
private final PalettedContainer.Strategy strategy;
- private final ThreadingDetector threadingDetector = new ThreadingDetector("PalettedContainer");
+ // private final ThreadingDetector threadingDetector = new ThreadingDetector("PalettedContainer"); // Paper - unused
public void acquire() {
- this.threadingDetector.checkAndLock();
+ // this.threadingDetector.checkAndLock(); // Paper - disable this - use proper synchronization
}
public void release() {
- this.threadingDetector.checkAndUnlock();
+ // this.threadingDetector.checkAndUnlock(); // Paper - disable this
}
public static <T> Codec<PalettedContainer<T>> codecRW(IdMap<T> idList, Codec<T> entryCodec, PalettedContainer.Strategy paletteProvider, T defaultValue) {
@@ -104,7 +104,7 @@ public class PalettedContainer<T> implements PaletteResize<T>, PalettedContainer
}
@Override
- public int onResize(int newBits, T object) {
+ public synchronized int onResize(int newBits, T object) { // Paper - synchronize
PalettedContainer.Data<T> data = this.data;
PalettedContainer.Data<T> data2 = this.createOrReuseData(data, newBits);
data2.copyFrom(data.palette, data.storage);
@@ -129,7 +129,7 @@ public class PalettedContainer<T> implements PaletteResize<T>, PalettedContainer
return this.getAndSet(this.strategy.getIndex(x, y, z), value);
}
- private T getAndSet(int index, T value) {
+ private synchronized T getAndSet(int index, T value) { // Paper - synchronize
int i = this.data.palette.idFor(value);
int j = this.data.storage.getAndSet(index, i);
return this.data.palette.valueFor(j);
@@ -145,7 +145,7 @@ public class PalettedContainer<T> implements PaletteResize<T>, PalettedContainer
}
}
- private void set(int index, T value) {
+ private synchronized void set(int index, T value) { // Paper - synchronize
int i = this.data.palette.idFor(value);
this.data.storage.set(index, i);
}
@@ -168,7 +168,7 @@ public class PalettedContainer<T> implements PaletteResize<T>, PalettedContainer
intSet.forEach(id -> action.accept(palette.valueFor(id)));
}
- public void read(FriendlyByteBuf buf) {
+ public synchronized void read(FriendlyByteBuf buf) { // Paper - synchronize
this.acquire();
try {
@@ -183,7 +183,7 @@ public class PalettedContainer<T> implements PaletteResize<T>, PalettedContainer
}
@Override
- public void write(FriendlyByteBuf buf) {
+ public synchronized void write(FriendlyByteBuf buf) { // Paper - synchronize
this.acquire();
try {
@@ -231,7 +231,7 @@ public class PalettedContainer<T> implements PaletteResize<T>, PalettedContainer
}
@Override
- public PalettedContainerRO.PackedData<T> pack(IdMap<T> idList, PalettedContainer.Strategy paletteProvider) {
+ public synchronized PalettedContainerRO.PackedData<T> pack(IdMap<T> idList, PalettedContainer.Strategy paletteProvider) { // Paper - synchronize
this.acquire();
PalettedContainerRO.PackedData var12;