Paper/patches/server/0159-handle-ServerboundKeepAlivePacket-async.patch
Spottedleaf 01a13871de
Rewrite chunk system (#8177)
Patch documentation to come

Issues with the old system that are fixed now:
- World generation does not scale with cpu cores effectively.
- Relies on the main thread for scheduling and maintaining chunk state, dropping chunk load/generate rates at lower tps.
- Unreliable prioritisation of chunk gen/load calls that block the main thread.
- Shutdown logic is utterly unreliable, as it has to wait for all chunks to unload - is it guaranteed that the chunk system is in a state on shutdown that it can reliably do this? Watchdog shutdown also typically failed due to thread checks, which is now resolved.
- Saving of data is not unified (i.e can save chunk data without saving entity data, poses problems for desync if shutdown is really abnormal.
- Entities are not loaded with chunks. This caused quite a bit of headache for Chunk#getEntities API, but now the new chunk system loads entities with chunks so that they are ready whenever the chunk loads in. Effectively brings the behavior back to 1.16 era, but still storing entities in their own separate regionfiles.

The above list is not complete. The patch documentation will complete it.

New chunk system hard relies on starlight and dataconverter, and most importantly the new concurrent utilities in ConcurrentUtil.

Some of the old async chunk i/o interface (i.e the old file io thread reroutes _some_ calls to the new file io thread) is kept for plugin compat reasons. It will be removed in the next major version of minecraft.

The old legacy chunk system patches have been moved to the removed folder in case we need them again.
2022-09-26 01:02:51 -07:00

41 lines
2.1 KiB
Diff

From 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Shane Freeder <theboyetronic@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 5 Oct 2017 01:54:07 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] handle ServerboundKeepAlivePacket async
In 1.12.2, Mojang moved the processing of ServerboundKeepAlivePacket off the main
thread, while entirely correct for the server, this causes issues with
plugins which are expecting the PlayerQuitEvent on the main thread.
In order to counteract some bad behavior, we will post handling of the
disconnection to the main thread, but leave the actual processing of the packet
off the main thread.
also adding some additional logging in order to help work out what is causing
random disconnections for clients.
diff --git a/src/main/java/net/minecraft/server/network/ServerGamePacketListenerImpl.java b/src/main/java/net/minecraft/server/network/ServerGamePacketListenerImpl.java
index 32c4383cfb4cab6329d7046c48daf3050fa027c6..c4f1ded84ec1ed152faeb835a3f50b7e31356655 100644
--- a/src/main/java/net/minecraft/server/network/ServerGamePacketListenerImpl.java
+++ b/src/main/java/net/minecraft/server/network/ServerGamePacketListenerImpl.java
@@ -3242,14 +3242,18 @@ public class ServerGamePacketListenerImpl implements ServerPlayerConnection, Tic
@Override
public void handleKeepAlive(ServerboundKeepAlivePacket packet) {
- PacketUtils.ensureRunningOnSameThread(packet, this, this.player.getLevel()); // CraftBukkit
+ //PacketUtils.ensureRunningOnSameThread(packet, this, this.player.getLevel()); // CraftBukkit // Paper - This shouldn't be on the main thread
if (this.keepAlivePending && packet.getId() == this.keepAliveChallenge) {
int i = (int) (Util.getMillis() - this.keepAliveTime);
this.player.latency = (this.player.latency * 3 + i) / 4;
this.keepAlivePending = false;
} else if (!this.isSingleplayerOwner()) {
+ // Paper start - This needs to be handled on the main thread for plugins
+ server.submit(() -> {
this.disconnect(Component.translatable("disconnect.timeout"));
+ });
+ // Paper end
}
}