mirror of
https://github.com/PaperMC/Paper.git
synced 2024-07-16 16:45:26 +02:00
6f2009754d
At the time this was re-added, there was concern around how the JIT would handle the system property that enabled it. This shouldn't be a problem, and as such we no longer need to block access to it. The Vanilla Method Profiler will not provide much to most users however there is no harm in providing it as an option. For most users, the recommended and supported method for determining performance issues with Paper will continue to be Timings.
38 lines
1.6 KiB
Diff
38 lines
1.6 KiB
Diff
From 3413ad534b54b0203e71ba0293a5a51ada2b097d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
|
|
From: Aikar <aikar@aikar.co>
|
|
Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2018 14:13:33 -0400
|
|
Subject: [PATCH] Disable Explicit Network Manager Flushing
|
|
|
|
This seems completely pointless, as packet dispatch uses .writeAndFlush.
|
|
|
|
Things seem to work fine without explicit flushing, but incase issues arise,
|
|
provide a System property to re-enable it using improved logic of doing the
|
|
flushing on the netty event loop, so it won't do the flush on the main thread.
|
|
|
|
Renable flushing by passing -Dpaper.explicit-flush=true
|
|
|
|
diff --git a/src/main/java/net/minecraft/server/NetworkManager.java b/src/main/java/net/minecraft/server/NetworkManager.java
|
|
index b93a26e8..3d32e005 100644
|
|
--- a/src/main/java/net/minecraft/server/NetworkManager.java
|
|
+++ b/src/main/java/net/minecraft/server/NetworkManager.java
|
|
@@ -78,6 +78,7 @@ public class NetworkManager extends SimpleChannelInboundHandler<Packet<?>> {
|
|
// Paper start - NetworkClient implementation
|
|
public int protocolVersion;
|
|
public java.net.InetSocketAddress virtualHost;
|
|
+ private static boolean enableExplicitFlush = Boolean.getBoolean("paper.explicit-flush");
|
|
// Paper end
|
|
|
|
public NetworkManager(EnumProtocolDirection enumprotocoldirection) {
|
|
@@ -255,7 +256,7 @@ public class NetworkManager extends SimpleChannelInboundHandler<Packet<?>> {
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if (this.channel != null) {
|
|
- this.channel.flush();
|
|
+ if (enableExplicitFlush) this.channel.eventLoop().execute(() -> this.channel.flush()); // Paper - we don't need to explicit flush here, but allow opt in incase issues are found to a better version
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
--
|
|
2.14.3
|
|
|