mirror of
https://github.com/plan-player-analytics/Plan.git
synced 2024-11-16 15:45:16 +01:00
87 lines
3.2 KiB
Markdown
87 lines
3.2 KiB
Markdown
# Writing a good issue
|
|
In order to be useful for the maintainers issues should include as much information as possible about the issue.
|
|
The information is crucial for reproducing the issue.
|
|
|
|
## :warning: Good exception report
|
|
|
|
- [Example of a good issue report for an Exception](https://github.com/plan-player-analytics/Plan/issues/945)
|
|
|
|
### Contains
|
|
|
|
- Description about what is wrong, or what was done before the issue happened.
|
|
- Version information, Server information and what database is in use
|
|
- Exception pastebin/gist link or inside code block (Surrounded by 3 ``` characters)
|
|
|
|
## :eyeglasses: Good visual bug report
|
|
|
|
### Contains
|
|
|
|
- Description about what is wrong
|
|
- Full page screenshot containing the visual issue, with issue possibly highlighted
|
|
- Version information, are any custom html files being used
|
|
|
|
## :coffee: Good feature request
|
|
|
|
- [Example of a good feature request](https://github.com/plan-player-analytics/Plan/issues/872)
|
|
|
|
### Contains
|
|
|
|
- Description about what the feature solves (How can this be used?)
|
|
- Description about the feature
|
|
- Alternative features that would solve the same use case you have considered
|
|
|
|
# Writing a good Pull Request
|
|
|
|
In order to make it easier to contribute two wiki articles are available:
|
|
- [Project Setup](https://github.com/plan-player-analytics/Plan/wiki/Project-Setup) on setting up the build environment
|
|
- [Project Architecture](https://github.com/plan-player-analytics/Plan/wiki/Project-Architecture) on structure of the project
|
|
|
|
## :tophat: Good Pull Request
|
|
|
|
### Contains
|
|
|
|
- 1 to 750 changes
|
|
- Descriptive commit messages
|
|
- Summary of what the PR contains
|
|
- Automatically or manually tested code
|
|
- (Summary of manual tests)
|
|
|
|
### Code
|
|
|
|
You can code with whichever style you find most comfortable, as long as it is readable, but be aware that it will be formatted after your PR has been merged.
|
|
|
|
- Variables describe what they contain
|
|
- Methods do one thing (Single Responsibility Principle)
|
|
- Comments
|
|
- When reason for doing something might be unclear, it is commented ("The value might be over 100, so it has to be checked")
|
|
- When something might break in the future, it is commented ("MySQL v5.6.2 might optimize this fix away")
|
|
- When something is unclear, it is commented ("I don't know if this works")
|
|
- Magic numbers are named with variables (`getItem(id)` instead of `API.getItem(5)`)
|
|
|
|
### Testing
|
|
|
|
Sometimes things do not work how they should, so testing is a good practice.
|
|
|
|
- [Instructions for running build and test goals](https://github.com/plan-player-analytics/Plan/wiki/Project-Setup#building-and-testing)
|
|
|
|
Because plugins often require mocking for tests, I do not require automatic tests for PRs.
|
|
|
|
## :chart_with_upwards_trend: Good Review on a Pull Request
|
|
|
|
Good reviews should leave both the reviewer and the contributor positive feeling about the interaction.
|
|
|
|
### Contains
|
|
|
|
- Questions about possible concerns about the code
|
|
- Notes about possible bugs or mistakes
|
|
- Positive encouragement
|
|
- (Advice)
|
|
|
|
### Does not contain
|
|
|
|
- Comments against the person submitting the PR
|
|
- Fast to fix things
|
|
- Formatting advice about small things ("If blocks should use brackets")
|
|
- Nitpicking ("This variable should be called bar instead of foo")
|
|
- Typos
|